|
Meaningful
Coincidence - Reality not Myth
An In-Depth Study
of Meaningful Coincidence and How to Derive that Meaning
1. Background
This site is about meaningful coincidence predicting air disasters
with high precision between November, 2008 and June, 2009. It was not just one air disaster
but four and
all of them involved the same predictive elements as those which predicted the
Lockerbie air disaster, twenty years earlier. This site is also woven around death, a
death much closer to me than those who died in the various plane
crashes, that of my wife Jenny.
It is also woven around God's
inspiration in a Hollywood film. I know that is hard to believe
given the tediously similar or frequently violent, mind-numbing trash which is the normal fare produced by
Tinseltown. But intricately tied in to this inspired Hollywood film
is the evidence produced by two mediums of the
survival of Jenny's
spirit beyond death. Mind that was not much of an advertisement
for Spiritualism because although two did succeed, that was only after 30
had failed. They succeeded because it was their destiny.
They were 'Chosen Ones'.
2. Attitudes of the Media
The site also illustrate the
hypocrisy of television people,
producers and presenters, their
claims to inform thinly disguising the real purpose of television being
entertainment and profitability. The programmes merely confirm their
own prejudices, as do the 'offerings' of journalists to their own
particular deities. A prize example of this was drawn to my
attention in a Guardian article which I found just a few days ago.
( At this point I felt I should check the exact
date I came across it. It was c 1am on 14th September, 2012.
In searching for that in 'my system' I suddenly saw a fascinating
connection regarding the name Jessica, the commissioning editor of the
Guardian article below........ To avoid losing the thread of this
page it continues at
Understanding the Jessica Code . It proves Spiegelhalter is WRONG.)
Meaningful coincidences
reveal the truth to us, however much
shallow journalists such as
David Spiegelhalter derive satisfaction from making light of a real phenomenon
and mocking the people who wonder at incredibly thought-provoking things that
happen in their lives. (Apparently he is not actually a
journalist but a 'renowned' Cambridge professor of statistics
-risk analysis - who just writes like a mocking, shallow journalist. ) His article
of Monday, 6th
December 2010 13.11 GMT, in the Guardian can be
found at
The Myth of Meaningful Coincidence He begins with a summary:
There is a strong tendency to find patterns and meaning in our
lives, but the truth is unlikely things happen very frequently
........
and proceeds to
trot out so many of the same tired arguments the sceptics always trot
out..... birthdays of a group in a room etc. Hence
the 'inspired 'photo of a birthday cake to illustrate the article for
the really feeble-minded to enable them to recall what birthdays are..... Coincidences
are so hard to photograph and they are just illusions anyway, unlike
birthdays. Sceptics like Spiegelhalter always go for the easy
things to calculate the odds. They should try some really
unlikely things, like our air disaster
prophecy coincidence codes...... the repeat of 557.... Don't tell me it is
subjective. The numbers in the code repeats are there over twenty
years, somewhat longer than the twenty minutes it looked like
Spiegelhalter spent on his Guardian commision. The question is
what do they mean? Nothing would seem to be Spiegelhalter's answer.
I am stupidly looking for and finding meaning because of a software
problem in my brain and in so many other people who find real meaning in
coincidence. Can our 557 coincidences
really all be chance? But the sceptics have a one-size-fits-all answer
to get out of dealing with my evidence too.
'The problem is ill-defined' ...ie the real world is too hard for
us. We'll stick to hands at playing cards and birthdays...
If we get bored we'll give NASA a hand at estimating the probability of
the total loss of a Space Shuttle. We couldn't be any more wrong
than they were. NASA's original risk assessment was 1 in 100, 000
flights. After all, all the major systems were duplicated or even
triplicated. Correct answer - 1 in 57. It turned out that
some things that mattered were not triplicated; the O-rings weren't triplicated
or even duplicated (Challenger) and neither was the leading edge of the wing
(Columbia) .... The loss of
the Shuttle Columbia was a key element in my proving the
interconnectedness of four major disasters in The Diagrams of Truth..
See
The Four Jigsaws website for more on that.
No, it is not meaningful coincidence that is
a myth but the idea of the investigative journalist. That must be the
ultimate oxymoron, rare as hen's teeth. Spiegelhalter was clearly
told to write something.... The clue was at the end.
This series gathers articles which were inspired and
commissioned via Comment is free's
You
tell us threads .
One of the respondents, Alicol was far more perceptive :
We use
coincidence to rationalise events which would otherwise be unfathomable.
The passenger who misses a 'plane which crashes with no survivors, what
caused the delays that meant that just one person lived? I like the
idea of coincidence and that perhaps we're not in as much control of our
lives as we'd like to think, but if we analyse the hell out of every
action we make and what the opposite effect could have been then we'd go
crazy,
3. External Orchestration
My
research proves that we are not in real control at all, not of what
really matters. Its all illusion..... But its not a question of
'analysing
the hell out of every action' Most people analyse nothing at
all. They could chose to think far more. But most are 'too busy'. They
are largely unaware of much beyond their immediate day-to-day lives.
The time people now waste on their smart phones could be put to far
better use. Smart phones make the time wasted by Bill
Gates Solitaire gift to mankind seem utterly trivial back in the stone
age of computers in the early 90s. People could try exercising
their minds instead of their fingers, but the only fad now is exercising
the body.
It is as though
the events from October 2008 June 2009 were orchestrated to demonstrate
conclusively we are not in control at all and to prove that Camille Flammarion's
astute observations were correct. In 1900 he
noticed that meaningful coincidences appear to be clustered around
death. And my work is the first since he wrote that to be able to prove it.
But over the course of that century in any case no one has bothered to
try. There is no money in it, no cosy
research grants. There is no academic kudos because the
field is 'academic suicide'. And it involves far too much
patience, perseverance and also a life in the real world, not in the
cosy cloisters of academia. Those three
things that make it an unprofitable field for academics. It also demands
honesty and integrity. That too rules out a large number of people,
both in and out of the academic world.
There are lots of happy coincidence sites on the
Internet. They largely consist of accounts of individual coincidences,
just like most of the books published on coincidence.
None is concerned with patterns between apparently totally separate
series of meaningful coincidences.
This is because most authors are mere aggregators. Their own
experiences of coincidence are severely limited. Nor is any them able to illustrate the application of meaningful
coincidence to the study of death and beyond. This is because of
course death is not a happy topic and New Agers like to put forward
coincidence as a happy topic proving 'connectedness'. And
close experience of death is not something people want to know about as
anyone bereaved will attest. You would think that death was
contagious.
The coherence of the coincidences on this site
should make thinking people wonder. Unfortunately there are all too
few of them in the world today. The world has gone full circle
since the time of Gallileo, when the Church controlled 'The Truth'. Nowadays the universities and the
media are the 'fount of Truth' and they peopled by sceptics in line with
the current theology of
scientism for these latter days. There is nothing but the material
world and everything is governed by chance. The highest intelligence in the
universe is their own.
They are wrong on so many counts but
especially that one. Meaningful coincidence warns us of the
reality of an external source of intelligence, so vast that we cannot
even begin to comprehend it. That source of intelligence chooses to
orchestrate meaningful coincidences as well as so much else of our very
lives. It is an illusion to think we are in control of our own
destinies. Our choices are extremely limited. And even so
many of those
limited choices are made by people in power, almost always for the wrong
reasons.
The Webs of Destiny warn that the
Source of intelligence has had
enough of man's lies, arrogance, treachery and deceit. The Airbus
Codes have been used in part to refute the atheists with their Atheist
Buses Campaign, which incidentally also began in The Guardian ( October
2008 )and to warn that on death all are judged. Few will
pass that Judgement. To read more of the intricate webs woven
around four Airbus disasters, a Hollywood film and Jenny's death, read on
in Patterns in Space and Time
To see repeat patterns in Meaningful
coincidence Go to The Perpignan Airbus
Story.
For a briefer account focussing on the coincidence code repeats go to
Code 557 Disaster
Prophecy Repeat.
To understand a real message in meaningful coincidence go to
The Real
Message of Perpignan
To learn more about the apparent 'miracle on the Hudson', the second
Airbus crash, go to The Hudson
Airbus Story
To read more about real external inspiration and its connection into the third
Airbus crash go to Knowing.
For more on Spiritualism and real evidence for life after death go to
Carolyn the Medium Who Could
To discover how I came to understand so much more see
Finding a Higher Reality
For how I came to investigate spiritualism se
A Spiritualist CV for CU
To look at the many other pages on this site go
to Site Map
Site re-published 1st October, 2012 6:04pm
Front page published two images at a most significant time.... 6:04:46pm
The Triumph of Death or the Three Fates...Cut388
6:04:48pm The Triumph of Death or the Three Fates...+C229wS.
Both images were originally 507 pixels wide. For images see
The Thread of 507.
446 is Judgement on Death and 448 is Knowing, two of the key
codes to emerge from this in-depth study deriving meanings from
meaningful coincidences. |